(2001.11.23)
Errata for Dixon and Mortimer ''PERMUTATION GROUPS'' (Springer 1996)
Chapter 1
11:-10 read ``on each of its orbits of length > 1,''
13:13-15 read ``Suppose that G is a group acting primitively on a set W and that D is a proper subset of W containing at least two points. Show that for each pair of distinct points ...''
13:18 add ``[Hint: Show that the relation a ~ bÛ(for all x Î G, { a,b}ÇDx = { a,b} or Æ) is a G-congruence.]''
17:-3 read ``If D,D¢ Î S are fixed setwise by H, then ''
19:21 read ``If fix(Ga) is finite, show it is a block for G.''
23:9 read ``and let a Î W. ''
27:-10 read ``acting transitively on a set W''
Chapter 2
35:20 read ``Hence show that Sn acts ...''
48:-5 read ``Spm ( @ Sym(Dm)) ''
53:15 read ``and G¥0 transitive on the nonzero elements of F.''
57:-18 read ``the set of projective points ... "
63:-16 read ``PGL2(5) @ S5''
Chapter 3
66:-9 read ``the diagonal orbit D1: = { (a,a) | a Î W} ; the other orbitals are called nondiagonal.''
68:9 read ``H: = á t ñ ''
70:-16 delete ``that G is finite,''
75:-19 read ``A3 is a composition factor''
84:-1 and 85:1,2 replace ``2-cycle'' by ``3-cycle'' and ``p ¹ 2'' by ``p ¹ 3''
93:-8 read ``(a1+...+ak)p = a1p+...+akp ''
102:20 read ``w Î W''
Chapter 4
110:4 read ``each point stabilizer of H is its own normalizer in H, ''
124:-4 read ``H is a transitive normal subgroup''
Chapter 5
163:4 read ``5.5.2 Using the fact that l(s+1) ³ (2s-4)/3 ...''
170:1-4 read ``5.7.3 Show that A6 is isomorphic to SL2(9) modulo its centre. Hence l(6) = 2.''
170:5-6 read ``5.7.4 Show that there is no field F for which SL2(F) contains a finite preimage G of A7. (However, A7 is isomorphic to a section of SL3(25), and so l(7) = 3.)''
170:13 read ``For all k ³ 5, l(k) ³ (2k-6)/3.''
172:8 read ``... Since k ³ 8, we have d ³ 3''
172:21-22 read ``... shows that d-2 ³ {2(k-3)-6}/3 and hence d ³ (2k-6)/3 as required. ...''
172:after the last line add the following paragraph:
``Note that if d = 3 then the Jordan form for x cannot consist of a single block. Indeed, the centralizer of such a block is a group of upper triangular matrices and hence solvable, but we know that CG(x) is not solvable.''
173:2 delete ``(since d ³ 4)''
Chapter 7
210:-2 read ``the stabilizers Ga1a2...ak of k points''
217:10 read ``Theorem 7.2C shows''
217:13 read ``finite Frobenius''
Chapter 8
256:15 read ``has order | W| for c = À0 and order at most | W| c for À0 < c £ |W|.''
262:12 read ``Theorem 3.3C shows ''
263: replace the second paragraph by:
Let G £ FSym(W) be residually finite. We have to show that every orbit of G is finite. Suppose the contrary and let S be the union of the infinite G-orbits. Put K: = G(W\S).
First note that if H £ G has finite index in G, then S is a union of infinite H-orbits. Indeed, if g Î S, then |gH| = | H:Hg| ³ | G:Gg| /| G:H| .
We next show that K must be transitive on each infinite G-orbit G. Fix a,b Î G with a ¹ b and choose x Î G such that ax = b; we must show that az = b for some z Î K. Put D: = supp(x)ÇS and F: = supp(x)\D. Since each point in the finite set F lies in a finite G-orbit, G(F) has finite index in G, and so all the G(F)-orbits in S are infinite. Thus Theorem 3.3C shows that there exists y Î G(F) such that the finite subset D Í S satisfies DyÇD = Æ. Since the supports of x and y on the invariant subset W\S are disjoint, z: = xyx-1y-1 leaves all points in W\S fixed, and so z lies in K. On the other hand, by Î Dy Í S\D and so by Ï supp(x). Therefore az = (by)x-1y-1 = b as required. This proves the transitivity of K on each infinite G-orbit.
Finally, note that for each subgroup H of finite index in K, Lemma 8.3C(i) shows that (KS)¢ £ HS and so K¢ £ H. Since K is a subgroup of a residually finite group G, K is also residually finite, and so the intersection of all subgroups of finite index in K must be 1. Thus K¢ = 1 and so K is abelian. However, if G is an infinite K-orbit, then Lemma 8.3C(ii) applied to KGshows that Z(KG) = 1. Thus KG = 1 contradicting the transitivity of K on G. This completes the proof.
Remark 1 This proof is based on P.M. Neumann, ``The structure of finitary permutation groups'', Archiv Math. 27 (1976) 3-17.
Appendix B (These corrections are due to Heiko Theissen)
In Table B.2 the ranks of the normalizers of the following groups should be corrected:
A9 (degree 840): rank 9; L2(52) (degree 325): rank 10; L3(22).3 (degree 960): rank 10; L3(22).2 (degree 336): rank 6; U3(22) (degree 208): rank 4 and (degree 416): rank 5; S4(22).4 (degree 425): rank 5; Sz(23) (degree 560): rank 7; M12 (degree 495): both of rank 8.
Also the normalizer of H = S4(23) (degree 585) should be H.3.
In Table B.4 the following counts should be corrected:
Degree 91: there is only one cohort of type C (L3(9) is incorrectly listed twice)
Degree 244: there is only one cohort of type B
Degree 585: there is only one cohort of type E